Table of Contents
D.C.’s Metro system desires to improved monitor whether or not personnel in delicate safety positions are in shape for the job, like generating sure workers are not fatigued, really don’t have any untreated health care troubles that could incapacitate or hinder them, or are underneath the influence of medication and alcoholic beverages.
D.C.’s Metro program needs to improved monitor whether workers in delicate positions are match for the position when they demonstrate up for get the job done, in accordance to an audit from the Washington Metrorail Basic safety Commission.
The document, unveiled Tuesday, probed the transit agency’s “fitness for duty” plans for personnel associated in “safety sensitive” positions, which include rail controllers, educate operators and servicing staff, amongst other people.
It concluded that the Metro method needed to make positive workers aren’t fatigued do not have untreated clinical concerns that could incapacitate or hinder them or are not under the affect of drugs and alcoholic beverages.
The programs aid keep track of procedure of health-related circumstances and protect in opposition to dangers these as exhaustion “that would otherwise pose a chance of incapacitating, for instance, a prepare operator at the controls of a moving train,” the audit said.
But auditors pointed out a amount of deficiencies in Metro’s courses, indicating the agency disregarded needs that personnel in certain positions bear bodily exams and stored bad drug- and liquor-testing records.
“Metrorail are not able to fairly make sure that its staff members and contractors who are conducting security sensitive duties are absolutely free from impairment that could lead to incapacitation,” the report concluded.
Actual physical exams
Metro policies demand physical tests for workforce in sensitive positions at least each and every two a long time. But Metro has not evidently communicated the requirements to personnel “and does not consider methods to be certain the physicals are done,” auditors wrote.
“There are many Metrorail workforce who go without having the expected physicals for a lot of decades, and that many Metrorail personnel are not aware of this requirement,” the report explained, incorporating that that heightens the hazard “that a security sensitive worker is working a train or conducting other crucial features with undiagnosed or untreated situations such as diabetic issues, higher blood strain and sleep apnea that, when not thoroughly managed, raise the threat of reduction of consciousness.”
The protection commission also mentioned that Metro’s exhaustion-management guidelines — which have been caught up in decades of haggling between administration and employee unions — rely on “only fragmented data” for the specific hrs labored for many personnel. The fee explained that can make it difficult, and in some situations extremely hard, to monitor dangers this kind of as exhaustion.
Drug, alcohol testing
When it comes to drug and liquor screening, Metro is demanded to take a look at staff immediately after any incidents underneath a policy from the U.S. Division of Transportation.
The basic safety fee recommended Metro for further levels of testing, which includes regular random screening. But auditors who reviewed documents explained they uncovered hundreds of random exams were being in no way done, with no causes — this sort of as the worker was on a lengthy-expression family vacation — presented in documentation.
Over-all, the report encouraged Metro boost its report-maintaining practices and workflow, in its place of the hodgepodge of largely paper records it has now.
“Multiple individuals interviewed for this audit identified the deficiency of centralized electronic documents units as a chance that limits tracking and trending of information,” the report mentioned. Irrespective of the fact that Metro is 1 of the premier rail systems in the U.S., “individuals interviewed for this audit acknowledged the rudimentary nature of these documents.”
The report claims that Metro “hindered” the commission’s “efforts to proceed with this audit,” apparently declaring it was way too near in time to a individual audit of drug and alcoholic beverages screening necessary by the Federal Transit Administration. The protection commission also stated that Metro withheld details asked for by auditors and made “misleading statements.”
In a short statement provided to WTOP, Sherri Ly, a Metro spokeswoman explained: “Metro appreciates the perform of the WMSC, which noted quite a few optimistic techniques and proactive methods now taken to strengthen health of obligation systems. We are examining the remaining report and will answer with appropriate corrective action strategies.”
Afterwards Tuesday, Ly said in an email to WTOP, “We respectfully disagree with various statements in the report, together with that Metro withheld information and facts from the WMSC. We will outline these issues through the CAP process.”
WTOP’s Kate Ryan contributed to this report.
